the civil case disapproved for exclude compulsory

 the civil case disapproved for exclude compulsory.

[my opinion]
1.
the case had be disapproved by judicial affairs office.
the applicant, who is victim, was pleasant about that disapproved contrarily.
because the first term had be expired during the court review session,
but the perpetrator default.
we made phone calls to him, he say he had no money now, please extend the time limit.
thereafter the about disapproved notified to victim,
he could file the complaint of the negligent injury on the period even.  

if the court approve the mediation,
the victim will lose the right of the criminal compliant.
he only could petition the local court for enforcement on the ground of the mediation settlement.

2.
the owner of the vehicle, used by perpetrator, was absent.
I written down that "the settlement exclude the vehicle used by perpetrator".
and that become the reason of the court disapproved later.

afterward, I revise my routine sketch that
"the settlement exclude the damage of the vehicle, which used by someone".

[the fact]:
the ninth February 2023, about 07:30 o'clock
happen traffic accident,
motorcycle MJX, driver Mr. Lu.(no injury)
motorcycle MXH, driver and owner Mr. Huang.(body injury and vehicle damage)

[the record of traffic accident initial judgement]
the possible causes or misconduct.
<Mr. Lu>:
1. motorcycle goes to intersection, turning should be obey the sign or line.(there was two step turn left sign.)(road safety rule article 99 (2) 1)
2. turning vehicle, should be give precedence to the straight vehicle.(road safety rule article 102 (1) 7)
2. hadn't reach the center of intersection yet, rushing to turn left hurriedly.(road safety rule article 102 (1) 5)
<Mr. Huang>:(blank)

[appendix in dossier]
1. the record of the traffic accident initial judgement.
2. Mr. Huang's account in post.
3. Mr. Huang's motorcycle registration.
4. Mr. Huang's health ID card. (instead of identity card)
5. Mr. Lu's ID card, front and back.
above all were copies.

the sixth June 2023, reach the mediation settlement.
[record]
1. about body injury and vehicle damage of Huang's, Lu pay Huang 75 thousand new Taiwan dollars (below as same)(include compulsory insurance), transfer to the assigned account.(the post account number).
2. installment, the first term is the twentieth June 2023, paying 30 thousands. the remaining, before the twentieth of each month paying 15 thousand, from July 2023 until pay up. the last payment is the balance. if either term delinquent, all terms expire.
3. the case exclude the vehicle MJX.
4. both abandon the right of the civil claim exclude compulsory insurance, and abandon looking into the criminal liability, the complainant withdraw the criminal complaint.(below blank)

the seventh June 2023, submit to the local court for review.

the 16th June 2023, juridical affairs officer had disapproved it.
[the reason of disapproving]:
1.recording in the first of the settlement clause, the payment include compulsory insurance, Lu transfer to the assigned account and so on. that likely mean Huang couldn't claim for compulsory insurance payment from the insurer of MJX.
2.comparison about the fourth clause, both abandon civil claim exclude compulsory insurance and so on. about excluding the compulsory insurance, not mention belong to which vehicle, therefore, that mean Mr. Huang could claim for compulsory insurance of MJX? is there inconsistency with the first clause?

to the 21th June 2023.
Mr. Lu delinquent, the first term 30 thousand default.
I believe that mediation again is in vain, because Lu had delinquent already.
I served the petitioner and victim, Mr. Huang, invite him come the borough hall.
I given him:
1. a criminal compliant form.
2. an ancillary civil action form.
3. the court disapproved mail.
4. the mediation settlement signed by both.
indicate Mr. Huang attaching the medical documents, and file this to the public prosecutor's office directly.

[appendix]
<The Township and County-Administered City Mediation Act> Article 27
After the mediation agreement approved by the court, for the mediation facts the party may not file the lawsuit, the complaint, or the private prosecution.

<Taiwan high court criminal judgement 106 ROC traffic appeal simple No. 122>
4. the public prosecutor appeal concise point out:
in the mediation settlement record, there have abandon civil claim, bot hadn't abandon criminal complaint, withdraw compliant or prohibit file compliant.
the complainant doesn't lose the right of criminal compliant.
the victim file the complaint of negligence injury to the my office, this filing legally.
the original judgement interpret the City Mediation Act Article 27 literally, the judgement violation the law, please reverse the original judgement and so on.
but, the case the 16th December 2015 reach the mediation settlement.
the settlement recording "both abandon the civil claim" only.
the 18th February 2016, the Banqiao local court approved the mediation case.
the record of mediation settlement noting that "the clause approved by the court, afterward, parties couldn't file action or criminal complaint or private prosecution".
therefore, victim can't file the criminal complaint obviously.
the Banquiao mediation commission record 104 criminal case copy in the dossier.

民事調解駁回案例_給付含強，拋棄權利不含強

 民事調解駁回案例_給付含強，拋棄權利不含強

[筆者短評]
1.
這件司法事務官不予核定
聲請人兼受害人反而很高興
因為在送法院審查的期間,第一期的付款時間已到了
加害人沒有準時付款,打電話問他,他說沒錢請再寛限時間
受害人在接到不予核定的通知後
還可以提告對方過失傷害罪

如果准予核定，受害人就會失去刑事告訴權
只能拿核定的調解書向法院民事執行處聲請強制執行了

2.
本件因為加害人方的車主沒有出面
所以我加記「本件調解範圍不包括車輛MJX(加害人使用的車輛)」
結果變成法院不予核定的理由

此後我的筆錄例稿改為
本件調解範圍不包括車輛OOO之「車損」

[本件事實]:
民國112年2月9日7時30分許，在OO市OO處，
普通重型機車車號MJX、駕駛:呂OO(無人傷);
普通重型機車車號MXH、駕駛兼車主:黃OO(有人傷)(有車損)，
發生交通事故。

[道路交通事故初步分析研判表]初步分析研判可能之筆事原因(或違規事實)
<呂OO>:
1.機車行駛至交岔路口,其轉彎,應依標誌或標線之規定行駛(兩段式左轉標誌)。(道安規則第99條2項1款)
2.轉彎車應讓直行車先行。(道安規則第102條1項7款)
3.未達路口中心處搶先左轉(道安規則第102條1項5款)
<黃OO>:(空白)

[卷內附件]:
1.道路交通事故初步分析研判表
2.黃OO郵局帳戶
3.黃OO普通重型機車行照
4.黃OO健保卡(代替身分證)
5.呂OO身分證正反面
均影本

112年6月6日調解成立
[筆錄記載]：
1.就黃OO之人傷及車損，呂OO單獨給付黃OO總額新臺幣(下同)7萬5千元整(給付金額含強制險)，匯入指定之金融帳戶內(郵局帳號)。
2.雙造同意以分期方式給付:第一期3萬元整，於民國112年6月20日前給付，其餘款項自民國112年7月起，按月於每月20日前給付1萬5千元整(最末期應給付之金額為未清償之餘額)，至全部清償完畢為止，如有一期未按時履行，視為全部到期。
3.本件調解範圍不包括車輛MJX。
4.民事部分，除強制險外，雙造均同意拋棄其餘民事之請求權;刑事部分，雙造均同意不追究對方之刑事責任，刑事告訴人同意撤回刑事告訴。(以下空白)

112年6月7日送法院審核。

112年6月16日司法事務官駁回。
[不予核定理由]:
1.依據調解書(筆錄)調解成立內容1.記載,本件賠償金額「包含強制險」由呂OO直接匯入指定帳戶等語。觀其義,應係黄OO不得另對車號MJXOOOO所投保之強制險申請理賠。
2.對照調解成立內容4.記載:民事部分,除強制險外,雙造均同意拋棄其餘民事之請求權...等語。就強制險除外部分,未指明何一車輛所投保之強制險,而依調解書(筆錄)所述,呂OO並無人傷,應無聲請強制險理賠餘地,準此,是否意在黄OO可另對車號MJXOOOO所投保之強制險申請理賠?是否與成立內容1.相異?

112年06月21日
因為呂OO沒有準時付款，第一期3萬元未付，
筆者覺得不用再補正了，反正呂OO沒有按約履行
筆者通知聲請人即被害人黃OO來公所
給他
1.刑事告訴狀
2.刑事附帶民事訴訟起訴狀
3.法院駁回公文
4.原簽立的調解書
請黃OO再附上醫單據，可直接向地檢署提告。

[附錄]
<鄉鎮市調解條例>第27條
調解經法院核定後，當事人就該事件不得再行起訴、告訴或自訴。

<臺灣高等法院刑事判決106年度交上易字第122號>
四、公訴人上訴意旨略以：檢視卷附被告與告訴人於新北市板橋
區調解委員會所成立之調解書內容，調解書上僅記載不得再
請求民事責任，並未記載被害人即告訴人因而拋棄刑事請求
權或撤回告訴、不得再行告訴等意旨，告訴人並未因與被告
調解成立而喪失本件過失傷害案件之刑事告訴權，其於告訴
期間內向本署提出本件過失傷害案件之刑事告訴，即屬告訴
合法，惟原判決卻僅就鄉鎮市調解條例第27條第1 項規定為
表面上之文字解釋，逕而違法認定告訴人所為之告訴不合法
，顯屬判決違背法令，請求撤銷原判決云云。然查，本件被
告與告訴人於104 年12月16日達成調解，而調解書內雖僅表
明「兩造其餘民事請求拋棄」；惟該調解書嗣於105年2月18
日經臺灣新北地方法院板橋簡易庭核定，觀諸其核定之附註
⒈明確記載「調解經法院核定後，當事人就該事件不得再行
起訴、告訴或自訴」，從而告訴人對於本件刑事訴追部分，
當再無行使告訴之權甚明，此有新北市板橋區調解委員會調
解筆錄104年刑調字第3213號影本附卷可參（見臺灣新北地
方法院檢察署105年度偵字第6907號卷第8頁；原審105年度
審交易字第1487號卷第14頁）。

the civil case disapproved _ without identity document, couldn't determine who was someone

 the civil case disapproved _ without identity document, couldn't determine who was someone

the fact:
the thirteenth February 2023, 07:50 o'clock, traffic accident happens.
the driver is Mr. Zheng, the vehicle owner corporationC.
the driver Mrs. Li, the vehicle owner Mr. ChenA, passenger ChenB.

possible cause of the traffic accident on the police record:
the taxi driver Zheng:
not keep safe distance between the vehicle. (The road safe rule article 94 (1)).
note: involving driving under the influence. the case transferred to the third branch precinct police for inspecting. the accident cause determined up to court's judgment.
note: driving under influence. (Alcohol test 0.16MG/L, violating road traffic penalty act article 35 (1) 1, the ticket number is RB06OOOO.)
the motorcycle driver Li:(blank)
the motorcycle passenger ChenB:(blank)

the corporationC hadn't designate person to participate mediation.

reaching settlement during the mediation, recording below:
1.the settlement include: the body damage of Mrs. Li, the vehicle damage of ChenA's, and the body damage of ChenB.
2.Zheng should pay Li, ChenA, ChenB the amount ten thousand new Taiwan dollar, exclude compulsory insurance, payment deadline is the eleventh June 2023, transfered into the post account OOOO.
3.this case excluded the vehicle license plate number OOOO.
4.for civil, except compulsory insurance, both parties abandon civil claim. for criminal, both wouldn't pursue other's criminal responsibility, the criminal complainant withdraws the complaint.

the 17th May 2023, the borough hall submits to the local court for review.

the 31th May 2023, the judicial affairs officer disapproves the mediation, returned it to the borough hall.
the disapproved reason:
without identity document copies of applicant, guardian, agent, the court couldn't determine the parties was of whom.


after I inspecting, the dossier submitted to the court already attached the household certificate.
the second June 2023, in the submitted letter I pointed out that there has the household certificate, submitted to the local court again.

my opinion:
1.the case there had been the copy of household certificate, the name of applicant and others on this.
I don't know which was the judicial affairs office indicated "identity document".
was the household certificate insufficient?
I heard something about ignorance of judicial affairs officer from the other borough clerk.
therefore, I reorganize the dossier, submit it to the local court for review again.

2.
because corporationC didn't assign someone in present, and not appoint the driver Mr. Zheng.
I noted in mediation clause that excluded the vehicle number OOOO.

3.
ChenB, the one of the applicants, minor, one-parent, there is appointment of his father.
applicant already provided the household certificate, on that the notes not omit, it could demonstrate the guardian relationship enough.

民調駁回案例_未附身分證明文件影本,無法確定當事人是否同一

 民調駁回案例_未附身分證明文件影本,無法確定當事人是否同一

實事:
本件事實:民國112年02月13日07時50分許，在OO市OO路OO號處，
車號TOO-OO7駕駛鄭先生、車主C公司
車號5OO-OOM駕駛李女士、車主陳先生A、乘客陳B，
發生交通事故。

初判表記載可能之肇事原因:
計程車鄭先生:
未保持安全車距。(道安規則第94條1項)
註:涉及酒後駕車肇事。由轄管第三分局移請地檢署查處偵辦,肇事原因請依法院之判決為最終之確定。
註:酒後駕車筆事。(酒測值0.16MG/L,處罰例第35條1項1款、舉發單號:RB06OOOO)
普通重型機車李女士:
(空白)
乘客陳B:
(空白)

C公司沒有派員，也沒有委任其他人到場調解。

成立調解之具體記載內容：
1.本件調解範圍:李女士之人傷、陳先生A之車損、陳B之人傷。
2.鄭先生單獨給付總額李女士、陳先生A、陳B總額新臺幣(下同)1萬元整(給付金額不含強制險)，應於民國112年6月11日前匯入指定之金融帳戶內給付完畢。(郵局00OOOO-OOOO81)。
3.本件調解範圍不包括車輛TOO-OO7。
4.民事部分，除強制險外，雙造均同意拋棄其餘民事之請求權;刑事部分，雙造均同意不追究對方之刑事責任，刑事告訴人同意撤回刑事告訴。(以下空白)

112年5月17日公所送法院審核。

112年5月31日司法事務官不予核定，退回區公所。
不予核定理由:
未檢附聲請人、聲請人法定代理人、聲請人委任代理人之身分證明文件影本,無法確定當事人是否同一。

經筆者檢查，原卷早已附有聲請人等人的戶口名簿
112年6月2日，在公文註明原卷已有聲請人等人的戶口名簿，再送法院審核一次。

筆者短評:
1.
這件已經有附上戶口名簿影本了，聲請人三人的名字都在上面。
不知道司法事務官所稱的「身分證明文件影本」是指什麼。戶口名簿不夠嗎?
筆者有聽過其他區的調解秘書說，司法事務官會漏看文件。
所以我整卷後，在公文註明卷內有戶口名簿影本，再送法院審核一次。

2.
這件因為車主C公司沒派人來，也沒委任駕駛代理，所以註明「調解範圍不包括車輛TOO-OO7」。

3.
聲請人之一的乘客陳B，未成年，單親，有附上爸爸的委任書。
聲請人有提供戶口名簿或謄本，且記事欄不能省略，以明法定代理關係。

the civil case disapproved_ owners different, what is seal board up

 the civil case disapproved_ owners different, what is seal board up

fact:
the 8th floor's water leaking to the 7th floor.
co-owner of the 8th floor are Miss Ma in addition other four.
owner of the 7th floor is Mrs. Lin.

the 7th Mrs Lin sue against the 8th Miss Ma and four others.
the 12th December 2021, the judgement bound down.
plaintiff Ma and five others obligated to restore.

the syllabus of the judgment:
defendants should fix the 8th floor until not water leakage.
defendants pay plaintiff 8500 new Taiwan dollar, addition of the interest of the through 2021 until payment day, by 5% annual.
the litigation expenses bore by the defendants.
provisional execution after plaintiff provider security of 150,000 new Taiwan dollar; if defendants would provide security of 450,000, exempt from provision execution.

on the execution of the judgement, Lin agree that Mas hire worker to fix by herself.
but Mrs Lin and her husband were dissatisfied the progress and the procedure.

afterward, Miss Ma and four others transfer the 8th floor to Mr. Lin.

due to the dissatisfied of progress and procedure,
Mrs. Lin and her husband apply mediation to the borough hall.

the 23th may 2023, the settlement of the mediation:
1. Miss Ma should fix the water leakage, until the 8th wouldn't leak to the 7th, the expense bore by Miss Ma.
2.the water leakage should be identified in the term of two weeks after the completing, and afterward identification, conduct to seal board up.

the 24th may 2023, submit the case to the local court for review.

the first June 2023, the judicial affairs officer disapproved:
disapproved reason:
1.according to the record of land transcript , owner of the 8th is Mr. Lin.
why do you written that one of co-owner were Mrs. Ma and four others?
2.to the second clause, what is "seal board up"? you should write down the method and position, and bore by whom.

my opinion:
1.to the disapproved reason 1, the borough clerk couldn't check who is owner on the spot of mediation, written down by what parties said only.
that different with the court's judgement.
court could survey the information after the hearing carefully, the judgment needn't the parties' signature.
the borough mediation record the settlement clause on the spot, surveying on way and on authority, and need parties' signature on the settlement.

2. to the disapproved reason 2, on the mediation spot, there is no engineer, confirming the detail is no way.
there is no expert can help of identifying the method and the position.

3.may be, the clerk of the borough hall should survey the information carefully before the mediation session, or reach the agreement, but waiting survey, than dating another day for signing.
reply:if all cases survey thoroughly or reach agreement, but waiting another day for sighing after surveying, that is taking up time.
the clerk have on time to survey all detail, we have too much other work.
the most mediation cases were not reach agreement, all survey out unrealistic.
parties usually wouldn't go to the borough hall again in order to sigh on settlement in another day.
parties usually ask for get settlement right now.

4.having binding judgment, must persist compulsory execution completely.
must not to reach "compulsory execution agreement".
let court's compulsory execution department hire engineer for identification, fixing, requesting payment, fixing out completely.

5."compulsory execution agreement" mean, how to execute the judgement settling between parties.
"compulsory execution agreement" will construct enforcement defferral" mildly.
severely, the new fact happen after conclusion of oral-argument, without binding effect.

The Compulsory Enforcement Act Article 10
The enforcement court may defer the implementation of the compulsory enforcement upon obtaining the creditor's consent.
The time for the enforcement deferral in the preceding paragraph cannot exceed three months. Where the creditor petitions to resume the enforcement, the court is limited to re-consenting to the deferral of the enforcement one time. Upon the expiration of each deferral period, a creditor who does not petition to resume the enforcement within ten days upon the enforcement court's notice is deemed to have withdrawn his or her compulsory enforcement petition.
During the implementation of the compulsory enforcement, if unusual circumstances render it manifestly inappropriate to continue the enforcement, the enforcement court may change or extend the date of enforcement.

Code of Civil Procedure Article 400
Except as otherwise provided, res judicata exists as to a claim adjudicated in a final judgment with binding effect.
Where a demand of offset has been adjudicated, res judicata exists as to the offset amount to be applied for offset as demanded.

民調駁回案例_所有人不同、何謂「封板」

 民調駁回案例_所有人不同、何謂「封板」

事實:
8樓漏水至7樓
8樓由馬小姐等5人共有
7樓由林女士所有

7樓林女士對8樓馬小姐等5人提告
案經110年12月12日判決確定
被告8樓馬小姐等5人負有回復原狀之義務
判決主文:
被告應將其所有建物門牌號碼OO市OO路OO號八樓房屋修繕至不漏水。
被告應給付原告新臺幣捌仟伍佰元,及自民國一一〇年六月三十日起至清償日止,按週年利率百分之五計算之利息。
訴訟費用由被告負擔。
本判決於原告以新臺幣壹拾伍萬元為被告供擔保後,得假執行;但被告如以新台幣肆拾伍萬元為原告預供擔保,得免為假執行。

強制執行時，林女士同意由馬小姐等5人自行僱工修繕。
但林女士及其丈夫對修繕進度及施作均不滿意。

其後馬小姐等5人將8樓所有權移轉給林先生。

林女士及其丈夫因為對馬小姐自行僱工修繕不滿意
來公所申請調解。

112年5月23日，調解成立內容:
1.馬小姐願於民國112年6月3日前,修繕A屋之漏水以不滲漏至B屋為,修繕費用由馬小姐負擔。
二、施工須達不漏水程度(以施工完畢翌日起算二個星期認定是否已達不漏水程度),並於確定不漏水之後,再進行封板。

112年5月24日送法院審核。

112年6月1日，司法事務官駁回。
不予核定理由:
1.依卷內謄本所載之內容,門牌號碼OO市OO路OO號8樓之所有權人為林OO,何以原因事實卻將對造人「馬OO」記載為共有人之一?
2.調解成立之內容二,所稱之「封板」所指為何?應具體載明施作方式(工法)、地點,並載明負有該「封板」義務之人為何人?

筆者短評:
1.就不予核定理由1.，公所在調解當下，沒辦法查證建物所有權人為誰，只能憑當事人口說記載。
這跟法院下判決不同。
法院開完庭後，可以在庭後慢慢查資料，法官下判決也不用當事人簽名。
公所調解當場就要把筆錄打出來，沒辦法也沒能力查資料，還需要當事人在筆錄上簽名。

2.就不予核定理由2.，公所調解的當下，不會有工程專業人員在場，沒辦法確認各項專有名詞的具體內容。工法和地點也不會有專業人員在場詳述。

3.或許有人會說，公所為什麼不把案情查明，再進行調解?或是調解合意後，先不簽筆錄，查清楚後，再約一天來簽筆錄?
答案是:調解案件如果一一查明，再記筆錄，或是調解合意後，查明再簽筆錄，都太耗時了。
公所或承辦人都不可能有時間把案件疑點通通釐清。
兼辦的業務繁多，而且大多數的調解案件都是不成立的，一一查明不切實際。
當事人多半也不願意再抽時間，另外約再來公所簽筆錄。
當事人多半也會催促現在就記明筆錄簽名。

4.遇有確定判決，一定要堅持「強制執行到底」
千萬不要再達成「強制執行協議」
直接讓法院請專業的工程師來鑑定、修繕、請款，一路修到底修到好。

5.「強制執行協議」是指在判決後，由當事人間就如何履行判決內容的自主性合意
一旦有「強制執行協議」，輕者會構成「延緩執行」。
重者會導致在言辭辯論終結後發生新事實，不受既判力效力所及。


強制執行法第10條
實施強制執行時，經債權人同意者，執行法院得延緩執行。
前項延緩執行之期限不得逾三個月。債權人聲請續行執行而再同意延緩執行者，以一次為限。每次延緩期間屆滿後，債權人經執行法院通知而不於十日內聲請續行執行者，視為撤回其強制執行之聲請。
實施強制執行時，如有特別情事繼續執行顯非適當者，執行法院得變更或延展執行期日。

民事訴訟法第400條
除別有規定外，確定之終局判決就經裁判之訴訟標的，有既判力。
主張抵銷之請求，其成立與否經裁判者，以主張抵銷之額為限，有既判力。

the civil case: the compulsory insurance include today before, exclude after tomorrow.

 the civil case: the compulsory insurance include today before, exclude after tomorrow.

the fact:
the 17th February 2023, 17:10 o'clock, on some place, traffic accident happen.
vehicle BOO-OO21: driver and owner Mr Lin.
vehicle EOO-OO36: driver and owner Miss Wang.

the probability cause of the accident on the initial judgment:
Mr Lin:
change the lane, without let straight vehicle first.
(traffic safe rule: article 98, 1, subparagraph 6)
Miss Wang:
(blank)

Mr Lin appointed Mr Xiao at mediation.

the actually record of the mediation clauses:
1.for Wang's damage of body and vehicle, Lin pay Wang 300 thousands new Taiwan dollars (same below) total, include compulsory insurance benefits before today, the 17th may 2023, exclude after tomorrow.
2. expiration of the payment : the 16th June 2023, transfer into the account(post bank:000000-0520000).
3. except the compulsory insurance benefits, both agree to give up the civil claim , both agree wouldn't pursue the criminal liability, complainant withdraw the criminal complaint.(ending)

the 18th May 2023, submit to the local court for the review.

the 25th May 2023, the judicial affairs officer disapproved the mediation.
the reason of the disapproving:
according the record of mediation:"Lin pay Wang 300 thousands new Taiwan dollars total, include compulsory insurance benefits before today" so on.
ostensibly, the 300 thousands not include Wang's whole damage for body and vehicle completely.
for this payment, which damage is the subject, such as medical expenses before someday, or salary some period, that should be written on the clauses, in order to avoid quarreling in future.

my opinion:
before the first January 2023, the mediation reviewed by judge,
have not yet be disapproved because of recording like this.

the judicial affair officer's "ostensibly", split into two.
first, write down the total, but not write down include the whole compulsory insurance benefits completely.
second, I should write down the subjects of the payment.

if I want to revise the clauses, is that deleting the "total" enough?
or adding the subjects of the payment?
recording such is trivial, unusual, and may be omit something important carelessly.

the agency of the insurance company at the mediation site, they had got the mediation recording copy, on the basis of that could pay off the insurance benefits.
if payment on time afterward, parties wouldn't ask me for the authenticated copy of mediation recording.

if revising need my extra hard work, in addition it is uncertainty approving or not.
I usually take the dossiers back in the cabinet, not revising.

民調駁回案例_含調解當日以前之強制險理賠，不含調解當日之翌日以後之強制險理賠

民調駁回案例_含調解當日以前之強制險理賠，不含調解當日之翌日以後之強制險理賠

實事:
民國112年2月8日17時10分許，在OO市OO路OO號處，
車號:BOO-OO21駕駛兼車主:林先生(無人傷)(無車損)
車號:EOO-OO36駕駛兼車主:王小姐(有人傷)(有車損)，
發生交通事故。

初判表記載可能之肇事原因:
林先生:
變換車道，未讓直行車先行。(道安規則第98條第1項第6款)
王小姐:
(空白)

林先生委任蕭先生到場調解。


成立調解之具體記載內容：
1.就王小姐之人傷及車損，林先生給付王小姐總額新臺幣(下同)30萬元整(含今日112年5月17日以前之強制險理賠，不含明日18日以後之強制險理賠)。
2.應於民國112年6月16日前匯入指定之金融帳戶內給付完畢(郵局000000-0520000)。
3.民事部分，除強制險外，雙造均同意拋棄其餘民事之請求權;刑事部分，雙造均同意不追究對方之刑事責任，刑事告訴人同意撤回刑事告訴。(以下空白)

112年5月18日送法院審核。

112年5月25日法院不予核定。
法院不予核定理由:
不予核定理由:依據調解筆錄(書)記載:「就王小姐之人傷及車損，林先生給付王小姐總額新臺幣30萬元(含11
2年5月17日以前之強制理賠)」等語。形式上推之，系爭30萬元未涵蓋王小姐因此次交通事故所受「全部」人傷
損害之賠償。則此次賠償金額，究係針對王小姐人傷中何特定損害(例如何年月日前已發生之醫療支出、或何期
間之失能工作損害)，應詳予究明並記載，以避免日後可能紛爭。

筆者短評:
在112年1月1日以前由法官審核調解書，如此記載沒有被駁回的紀錄。

司法事務官的駁回「形式上推之」，應是分二段。
一是，記載總額，但後面卻又記不含全部的強制險。
二是，應記明此次賠償金額是針對哪些特定損害。

所以如果我要補正，是把之前的「總額」拿掉即可?
還是一定要加記所賠償的損害的範圍?
這太瑣碎了，一般不會這樣記，而且可能會掛一漏萬。

保險公司人員在調解當天已經拿到成立筆錄的影本，已足以對公司內部請款。
事後有按時付款的話，當事人通常也不會再來跟我索取調解書正本。

補正如果徒增麻煩，會不會通過核定又不確定。
我都直接收回卷櫃，收工不補了。